COURT DOCUMENTS & AUDIO of winning case – no law requires a “photo” i.d. Further, a written citation is a form of identification. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!: http://www.myspace.com/sarajfight4freedom
Around 2:00pm Friday, August 7, 2009, my boyfriend (black male) and I were arrested because of supposed identification issues. My boyfriend and I had taken our previous cases to court in June and won. At the same time through a two day trial, I caught the cop (racist cops in AZ. Please do research on Sheriff Joe Arpaio.) doing perjury on the stand (assisted by the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office). And since I filed charges against that cop and I have a hearing this Tuesday for the perjury charges against him, my boyfriend and I have been harassed and pulled-over three times.
The cops supposedly arrested my boyfriend with supposed resisting arrest and disorderly conduct. When in fact, my boyfriend never resisted arrested and it was the cops who were in disorderly conduct since the time before they pulled me over (undercover cop admit following us for at least a mile before the initial two cop cars finally pulled us over ’cause according to them, it was my auto plate in the back of my car window the reason they pulled me over – not against state vehicle codes). And the reasons they harassed my boyfriend (racial profiling) was simply because he did not show them his identification – he was the passenger. Neither my boyfriend nor I were committing, or about to commit, any crimes. And therefore, the cops had no rights or jurisdiction to demand for his identification. My boyfriend was within his legal rights to refuse.
Further, while we were in the transportation vehicle to go to jail, my boyfriend explained that they supposedly found 3 warrants for his arrest. However, the only thing that matched on those warrants was his date of birth – not the first nor last name matched my boyfriend’s name. In addition, the state the cops claimed where my boyfriend had these supposed warrants; he never even visited that state.
I was finally released today on OR but they still have my boyfriend in jail and I’m very concerned for his well-being; he has seizures caused by lack of sleep.
My boyfriends’ mother just explained to me that my boyfriend called her stating he did not get OR (he does not have any priors and he’s employed) and that she posted bail already earlier this morning.
While I was in jail, I did not nor could not sleep. They placed 28 women in a holding cell in the size of a living room; it was very cold, women were cuddling with one another to stay warm, and even using toilet paper as blankets and on the cement floor for warmth – because the guards refused blankets. In addition, they mixed the drug attics, mentally ill, homeless people who may have illnesses, people with criminal history, and people with no criminal history, together. There was also a frail old women at least 70 years of age who claimed that two deputies threw her face down to the ground then kicked her – all because she explained that couldn’t be exposed by the sun because of her seizures and medications. She had a big swollen whelp on her left cheek and above her eye. She was in the holding cell for at least 3 minutes till she finally fainted and hit her head on the toilet seat. It took approximately 10 or minutes before the deputies finally arrived to help her. I finally saw this frail old lady in court today. She had a sling on her arm.
While that is horrible, the men had bad, too! Their rooms were smaller and they were more packed in their holding sells. And I know my boyfriend could not sleep – it was so crowded, most men were sitting – there was no room to lay down. [Reminder: no beds in holding cells.] [ Our meals were only twice a day and we received the exact same meal every day - bread, peanut butter, donut, cookie, orange, and juice - all in a plastic bag. All sugar and not a balanced meal, whatsoever].
The cops also towed my car, confiscated my laptop, camera, cell phone, driver’s license, auto insurance, and auto registration. They also confiscated my boyfriend’s cell phone, over $200.00, etc. Further, they stated that they will not release my car for 30 days . And they withheld our property until we went to their impound. My cell phone, driver’s license, and car has yet been returned!
All against the United States Constitution: Amendment 4 – Search and Seizure.
Currently, I will be going to court first thing Monday morning to subpoena my personal belongings. In addition, I have hearings on August 11, 18, 19, 26. and 28th – all based on the cops harassments. If anyone knows of an attorney who may be willing to help with a 1983 act for my boyfriend and myself, it will be highly appreciated!
Thank you,
Sara J
IF YOU’RE INTERESTED IN MY & MY BOYFRIEND’S CASES, MY TRAIL BRIEF & AUDIO @ www.myspace.com/sarajfight4freedom
Duration : 0:2:40
RSS
February 11, 2010
My name is C.J. and I was born in Shanghai, China. If you want to know about me, please visit This is an example for you of "About Me" area.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
I don’t know you; …
I don’t know you; so I don’t know about Discriminatgion; but definately sounds like you have a case Please visit Sera’s myspace page and look it over for possible action in your case and even contact her and I am sure she will gladdly advise you on your case
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Yeah, um… I’m …
Yeah, um… I’m being illegally profiled by my local police, they searched my vehicle without a warrant and been constantly watching me and been threatening to throw me in jail for someone that’s threaten my life and I have proof of it and yet they threaten to throw me in jail and all. Is this a case of discrimination?
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
shoulda said …
shoulda said ABSOLUTELY nothing. then they cant force u to say anything
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
stupid bitch
stupid bitch
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
she actually won …
she actually won this case in court though I believe.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
“You don’t have the …
“You don’t have the authority to ask him for anything….”
And
“I know the laws”
BRILLIANT
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Arizona Revised …
Arizona Revised Statutes 28-3166 (b)
“B. An application for a driver license and the driver license issued shall contain the photo image of the applicant or licensee. ….”
It only says photos three times in that one short paragraph.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Arizona Revised …
Arizona Revised Statutes 28-3166 (b)
“B. An application for a driver license and the driver license issued shall contain the photo image of the applicant or licensee. ….”
It only says photos three times in that one short paragraph.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Also, since you are …
Also, since you are apparently a lawyer now, perhaps you should read
Arizona Revised Statutes 28-3166 (b)
“B. An application for a driver license and the driver license issued shall contain the photo image of the applicant or licensee. ….”
It only says photos three times in that one short paragraph.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
It’s “does” not ” …
It’s “does” not “douse”.
You must be the white-trash boyfriend in the car with her.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Grammar in English …
Grammar in English Proper or not is not Relevent in the case. nor is the Political term “Elitist”.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
She needs to learn …
She needs to learn to spell and use proper grammar. Also, not to sound elitist. But poor people don’t normally win these fights.
She should have simply said nothing.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
How were they …
How were they harrassing police because they know their rights ?
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
your right.
your right.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
harassing? by not …
harassing? by not answering their unlawful questions? sorry, that is not a crime
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Sounds like Sara J. …
Sounds like Sara J. needs to get a life.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Seem like you two …
Seem like you two were harassing the police.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Share This, and …
Share This, and maybe a few of my other videos Please?)
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Yea well the law …
Yea well the law douse not say any thing about a Picture, there for if that is the reason he arrested her, and I can’t see any other reason he could try and use, then it’s clear to me it’s an illegal Arrest, and even it were’rnt he had no reason other then herasment agendas for pulling her over. .. He never even said why he pulled her over, and she asked him that first off. he was just Angry she knew her rights.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Indeed they may …
Indeed they may have known who she was and it is a KNOWN FACT that Phoenix PD is known for following, harassing and intimidating folks that they have a bone to pick with. Even more so than Arpaio…
But the issue at question is a valid form of ID must show all the requirements per title 28.
that means: Name, Address, DOB, Height, Weight, Male/Female and a pic.
With out those items it would not be considered valid.
But those cops were acting like jerks, instead of explaining what i did.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Yes but what she …
Yes but what she gave him was a valid drivers liscence acording to arizona state law, no other form of identification was nesisary, also its obvious that they knew who she was.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
The cop was giving …
The cop was giving you a way out here too: After his initial “wtf” moment, he asks do you have ANY form of picture ID. It looks like he was going to accept the paper if you gave him something else along with it. A University or Work badge would’ve likely kept you from getting arrested.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
A. Unless exempt …
A. Unless exempt pursuant to this chapter, a person shall not drive a motor vehicle or vehicle combination on a highway without a valid driver license and proper endorsement as prescribed by this chapter.
B. A person who is licensed under this chapter is entitled to exercise the privilege granted by this chapter on highways and is not required to obtain another license to exercise the privilege by a county, municipal or local board or a body with authority to adopt local police regulations.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
Um, yea, it does …
Um, yea, it does actually. Let me go find it for ya.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:40 am
still douse not say …
still douse not say in the written law that you need a picture so in fact its not the law